JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)February 7, 2018

A- de 2018

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice José Fernando Reyes Cuartas

✓Claimant Icbf

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

The case-law reporter has not yet indexed topics for this decision. The summary below describes what it is about.
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Con el presente auto la Sala Plena de la Corporación decide NO ACCEDER a la solicitud de desacumulación procesal del expediente T-6349652 presentada por el ICBF, cuya acumulación se ordenó por la Sala de Selección Número Nueve mediante auto del 26 de septiembre de 2017.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. NO ACCEDER a la solicitud de desacumulación procesal del expediente T-6349652, presentada por el Instituto Colombiano de Bienestar Familiar -ICBF, cuya acumulación fue ordenada por la Sala de Selección Número Nueve de la Corte Constitucional mediante Auto del 26 de septiembre de 2017.
  2. Segundo. Por Secretaría General infórmesele a la peticionaria lo resuelto en esta providencia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela